Do Not Hire Palm Beach Gardens Attorney David Steinfeld under any circumstance for any legal matter.
** Steinfeld files fake DMCA Complaints **
-------------------------------------
RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR
4-4. TRANSACTIONS WITH PERSONS OTHER THAN CLIENTS RULE
4-4.1 TRUTHFULNESS IN STATEMENTS TO OTHERS
"In the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly: (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person ..."
-------------------------------------
GUIDELINES FOR PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
A. General Principles
"A lawyer’s word (whether orally or in writing) should be his or her bond."
-------------------------------------
OATH OF ADMISSION (FLORIDA BAR):
"I do solemnly swear .... I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me such
means only as are consistent with truth and honor ... So help me God."
-------------------------------------
I would love to know how attorney David Steinfeld's absurd, idiotic, verifiable lies in his recent rambling Complaint to Google are consistent with these values.
Do not hire The Law Offices Of David Steinfeld! He lies, lies, lies, lies, and lies.
David Steinfeld is in a class by himself when it comes to being a liar.
I always tell kids, "Do honest, good work and the clients and the riches will come." Too bad David Steinfeld's parents never imparted this wisdom on him.
Shortcuts and lies will get David Steinfeld nowhere in life.
-------------------------------------
Update (Sept 18 2024 9:53 a.m. ET):
Lying scumbag David Steinfeld is at it again.
It has just come to my attention that Steinfeld has submitted a 100 percent bogus, meritless, baseless Complaint to Google regarding this website.
Read Steinfeld's pathetic rambling Complaint (filled with lie after lie) here: lumendatabase.org/notices/35089301.
What a desperate, pathetic asshole.
Steinfeld lied and lied and lied to try to keep you from seeing this website.
To submit the request, Steinfeld was required to check boxes that read:
"I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law" and
"The information in this notification is accurate and I swear, under penalty of perjury, that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an
exclusive right that is allegedly infringed."
So he is a fraud. A liar. A conman.
Steinfeld said a lot of crazy things in his rant to Google but the worst lie of them all is that I asked for and/or demanded money in exchange for this website.
Total bullshit. Bullshit. Bullshit. Bullshit.
Here is my message to Steinfeld on 4/25/23 in which he now says I tried to extort him:
I paid you for a telephone consultation so I could ask you questions about interlocutory appeals and that telephone conversation never took place.
Below is the e-mail I sent you in the morning when I woke up and found your e-mail.
As I indicated, your e-mail was of no use to me. I called it "entirely unnecessary."
Sue me and I will not only file a bar complaint, but as you know, I am an expert in digital marketing and
I will make website after website after website alerting the public to the scam you are running.
Here are the websites I currently am hosting about the last guy that stole from me.
Do not test me on this.
Where is the demand for money?
Where is the extortion?
Where is the mention of this specific domain name?
Where is the mention of any domain name containing "David" or "Steinfeld" or Steinfeld's shady law office?
Where is the mention of any money?
Where is the offer to sell or transfer any domain name or website?
The fact that I warned Steinfeld that this website would be forthcoming does NOT constitute extortion:
"However, in this case, there is no evidence that Kremer was trying to sell the domain name itself. The letter delivered by Kremer to Bosley's headquarters is a threat to expose negative information about Bosley on the Internet, but it makes no reference whatsoever to ransoming Bosley's trademark or to Kremer's use of the mark as a domain name."
Bosley Medical Institute, Inc. v. Kremer, 403 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2005).
David Steinfeld is just another sleazy South Florida lawyer.
That's all David Steinfeld is.
Liar = David Steinfeld. David Steinfeld = Liar.
David Steinfeld is a disgrace to himself, to his wife Yul Hui Steinfeld, and to his shady law office.
Clearly, David Steinfeld is not abiding by the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Lying is just part of who David Steinfeld is.
It's a shame David Steinfeld's parents taught him nothing.
Steinfeld is a world-class liar. I don't think David Steinfeld even knows what "extortion" means.
David Steinfeld is so full of shit and he knows it.
Liar, liar, liar, liar = PALM BEACH ATTORNEY DAVID STEINFELD.
Total freaking liar. I'm a millionaire and he's telling Google that I'm extorting him. Give me a freaking break.
See, Steinfeld hates being exposed as a con on this website.
And he knows that federal statutes and every single piece of relevant case law say that I'm only committing a tortious act if my intent is to "profit"
in some way from use of this domain name. It falls under "non-commercial" and "fair use" protections. Read some case law on the subject matter some time, you miserable, rotten
liar Steinfeld.
There clearly is no commercial purpose here so he lies and says I asked for money from him for the domain name.
Lie much, Steinfeld? Lies, lies, lies, lies. That's David Steinfeld. A born liar. Do not hire David Steinfeld.
Do you really want to hire a lawyer who submits phony, fake DMCA Complaints?
Do not hire Steinfeld. He is a liar and a con-artist.
CONSUMER WARNING!!
SHADY LAWYER WHO LIES, LIES, LIES, AND LIES!!
DAVID STEINFELD = TOTAL LIAR.
DAVID STEINFELD = DEGENERATE PIECE OF GARBAGE WHOSE BAR CARD SHOULD BE BURNED.
Fact = Clown lawyer David Steinfeld billed me for a service I did not request, authorize, or approve.
I cannot imagine what part of my request to set aside 15 minutes for a telephone consult about interlocutory appeals gives scumbucket
David Steinfeld the right to bill me for a rambling e-mail about judicial immunity and punitive damages!!
On what f***ing planet is attorney David Steinfeld living????
I got billed on 2/15/23 (when I was sound-asleep at freaking 9:06 at night!!) for $459 for an e-mail about judicial immunity and punitive damages that I did not request!
Who in the world does crazy lawyer David Steinfeld think he is?
Do not under any circumstance give attorney David Steinfeld your credit card number!!!
Crazy David Steinfeld is a 1-man shop who calls himself a law firm. No‑integrity David Steinfeld should quit the law today! He is a complete motherf*cker!!!
Important Consumer Warning About Crazy Lawyer David Steinfeld - FBN: 109517
Greedy, sleazy, scummy, douchebag attorney David Steinfeld of Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., is a total loon!!!
There are good lawyers and then there are bad lawyers and then there's 10 million miles of horse-crap and then there's Palm Beach Gardens attorney David Steinfeld.
Run as far and as fast as you possibly can from Palm Beach Gardens attorney David Steinfeld:
Law Office of Greedy Bastard David Steinfeld, P.L.
3801 PGA Blvd
Ste 600
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410-2756
Office: 561-316-7905
Cell: 561-827-2151
Fax: 561-828-7637
I asked for one service from Palm Beach Gardens attorney David Steinfeld and then received/got billed for a different one without my authorization!!!
Really classy way to run a business!!!
Whatever you do, do not hire this rotten, evil, horrible disgrace of a lawyer!
David Steinfeld is crazy and he is a nut. Make no mistake about that.
Attorney David Steinfeld would not stop inundating me to help his business with online reviews!!! Totally pathetic!!!
The service manager at Porsche always beseiges me to write reviews after he performs maintenance on my cars. Same for the Maître d' at Morton's. Not!!!!!!
Lawyer David Steinfeld is a desperate, pathetic piece of garbage who is going straight to hell.
Here is the near-verbatim review of Palm Beach Gardens attorney David Steinfeld that I just uploaded to another website.
I am offering $4,590 to anyone who can produce 1 single piece of evidence that proves anything that appears below is untrue.
Plus another $4,590 to that person's charity of choice.
-------------------------------
"My experience with Mr Steinfeld will forever remind me to always trust my instincts in the business world.
I got a terrible feeling about Mr. Steinfeld which I ignored and now I'm paying the price to the tune of a $459 charge that I did not
authorize, and which Mr. Steinfeld refuses to return. I had a good phone consultation with Mr. Steinfeld
at first during which he provided me with advice on deposing a witness and then using the depo transcript at trial and in an MSJ. Then I got
my first bad feeling. After just that one 30-minute interaction, I was hit with a request, on 12/3/22, to write glowing reviews of Mr. Steinfeld on 5 different
websites like this one. I declined because it made me uncomfortable and I found his request to be needy, uncouth, and unprofessional. He charges me
$450 an hour then wants me to take time out of my day to help promote his business? I would never ask a client to do anything like that. It's amateur.
Three weeks go by and I have not written any reviews so he has the cojones to follow up with me to ask me again, on 12/24/22, to help promote
his business (without any compensation to me) by writing reviews! Against my better judgment, I do it and I write two reviews.
I figure it would keep him happy, end his begging, and would be good karma. Boy was I wrong. It also gave me a bad feeling that Mr. Steinfeld would penny-pinch and start to add $9
to every $450 hourly charge for future phone consults for the expense VISA takes from him. I mean, really? You can't live a life of exorbitent excess on $441 an hour?
Most people in the world don't take home $441 per week! I hope that
extra $9 makes Mr. Steinfeld feel important. Then Mr. Steinfeld gave me horrible legal advice, which I was a fool for following. He said that nominal damages are
the "only" awards available to defamation per se plaintiffs when in fact the case law he cited (Lawnwood v. Sadow) mentions defamation per se plaintiffs
must receive "at least" nominal damages. Based on that wrong info, I filed a Motion To Amend my complaint to add a claim for punitive damages,
which was denied and which, I believe, gave the defendant the confidence not to negotiate at our required mediation, which, looking back, would
have been a great resolution to my case. Then, the real problem came with Mr. Steinfeld. On Wednesday, 2/15/23, I asked if he could set aside
15 mins for a telephone consult so I could ask him about the process of interlocutory appeals. His reply was shocking and I should have fired
him on the spot. "It'll take more than 15 minutes though so I'll run your card for an hours worth of time." You'll run my card for an hour?
Seriously? How do you know what my questions are? Again, my fault for not trusting my instincts. But his fault 100 percent for what happens next. We did not settle on a time
on Wednesday for the call so I go home to sleep. Next morning, I wake up and find a long rambling e-mail from Mr. Steinfeld about all sorts of
topics unrelated to interlocutory appeals, to which I immediately say, "Thanks but that was entirely unnecessary." I was totally
deflated because I knew he sent the e-mail just to whack me for $459, which of course, he did. The consult never took place because I had a sick sick feeling in my
stomach about Mr. Steinfeld. Weeks go by and Mr. Steinfeld never refunded my money. I figured no one can be so juvenile and corrupt to
do this to me but he did. When I finally asked Mr. Steinfeld to refund my money, he replied, "I performed a service for you" even though it
was a service I did not ask for, authorize, or approve. So be warned about Mr. Steinfeld. I think he is greedy and lacks any sense of right and wrong.
I would never keep a client's money in such a situation. Shame on Mr. Steinfeld. E-mail me for any additional information about Mr. Steinfeld or contact
the Florida Bar as I filed a formal complaint pertaining to this unauthorized $459 charge. I think a police report is in order, too, but I
have a hunch the cops will tell me it's civil theft and not for them to prosecute."
